我的理論聽起來不正經？- Kohut如何在精神分析界搞事情

1. Kohut的人生與思想
<<前傳—母與子：掙扎於自由與責任之間的基礎>>

Glover, E. (1924). Ch. 1 The Significance of The Mouth in Psychoanalysis. On the Early Development of Mind (pp.1-24). Routledge.
Kohut, H. (1970). Narcissism as a Resistance and as a Driving Force in Psychoanalysis. In Ornstein, P. (Ed.), The Search for the Self 2: 547-561. Karnac.
Strozier, C. (2001). Ch. 1~2 Prehistory & Beginnings. Heinz Kohut: The Making of A Psychoanalyst. Other Press.

2. 男性認同中的男同性戀渴望

Kohut, H. (1970). Narcissism as a Resistance and as a Driving Force in Psychoanalysis. In Ornstein, P. (Ed.), The Search for the Self 2: 547-561. Karnac.
Strozier, C. (2001). Ch. 3~6 The Tutor; Young Man Kohut; In the University; A Crumbling Universe. Heinz Kohut: The Making of A Psychoanalyst. Other Press. 

3. 創造力、共感、幽默感從何而來？—自戀的三種轉化

Kohut, H. (1957). Death in Venice by Thomas Mann: A Story About the Disintegration of Artistic Sublimation. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 26: 206-228.
Kohut, H. (1966). Forms and Transformations of Narcissism. JAPA.
Strozier, C. (2001). Ch. 10~13 Domesticity; The Couch; Mr. Psychoanalysis; On Empathy. Heinz Kohut: The Making of A Psychoanalyst. Other Press. 

4. 死亡、無常與智慧：不談死亡本能的理論卻不斷地與死亡工作

Kohut, H. (1972) Thoughts on Narcissism and Narcissistic Rage. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child 27 : 360-400.
Strozier, C. (2001). Ch. 15, 20, 21, 31 The Death of Else; Death and the Self; On Rage; Gentle into that Good Night. Heinz Kohut: The Making of A Psychoanalyst. Other Press. 

5. 『自戀』可載舟亦可覆舟—自體理論所要處理的分裂  《經典案例 Miss F》

Kohut, H. (1971). Ch. 11 Some Reactions of the Analyst to the Mirror Transference. The Analysis of the Self. The University of Chicago Press.
Strozier, C. (2001). Ch. 18~19 The Group Takes Shape; The Analysis of the Self. Heinz Kohut: The Making of A Psychoanalyst. Other Press.

6. 罪人vs悲劇人  《經典案例 Mr. J》

Kohut, H. (1971). Ch. 8 & 9 General Remarks about Narcissistic Transferences; Clinical Illustration of the Narcissistic Transferences. The Analysis of the Self. The University of Chicago Press.
Strozier, C. (2001). Ch. 17, 24~28 Heinz Kohut: The Making of A Psychoanalyst. Other Press. 

7. 是解構後自體會自動重建？還是分析師需要有自體會如何重建的理論？

Kohut, H. (1984). Ch. 3 The Problem of Scientific Objectivity and the Theory of the Psychoanalytic cure. In Goldberg & Stepansky Eds. How does Analysis Cure? Chicago Univ. Press.
Strozier, C. (2001). Ch. 29 The Healing of Psychoanalysis. Heinz Kohut: The Making of A Psychoanalyst. Other Press. 

8. 理論的性別化面向：藉由女性殺出重圍

Balsam, R. (2015). Oedipus Rex: Where are we going, especially with Females? Psychoanalytic Quarterly.
Geist, R. (2010). Empathizing with Oedipus: A Connectedness Perspective. IJP.
Strozier, C. (2001). Ch. 22 Self and Theory. Heinz Kohut: The Making of A Psychoanalyst. Other Press.

9. 精神分析理論當中的未完成：自戀與女性理論的崛起

Kohut, H. (1975). A Note on Female Sexuality. In Ornstein Ed. The Search For the Self, Vol 2. Karnac.
Harris, A. (2005). Gender as Soft Assembly. Routledge.
Scarfone, D. (2019). The Feminine, the Analyst and the Child Theorist. IJP 100: 567-575. 

10. 自戀之死亡與活力：分析中毫不心軟，究竟是溫暖的智慧還是殘酷的剖析？<一個最終的真實案例>

Strozier, C. (2001). Ch. 27, 30 The Waning Years; New Clinical Directions. Heinz Kohut: The Making of A Psychoanalyst. Other Press.
 
 

精神分析在美國是怎麼樣長大的？絕非橫空出世，而是源自英國的“正統”，加進拓荒的遼闊，接著是自由、人權的翻炒，成了美國精神分析獨有的口感。林俐伶分析師本系列主題為『女性主義和關係學派』，將先從「性別」開始談起，再進入「女性主義」，最後開展向「關係學派」。

不只理論的發展，甚至在個案神來一筆的聯想，所出現的都不會是天降神兵，而是源源脈絡當中可被看見的瞬間。分析師要做的，往往是收集瞬間、回頭看見脈絡，進而知道工作的方向。既然是脈絡，對錯好壞肯定不是那麼絕對了，邀請對女性主義、關係學派有興趣的朋友一起進入課程，從女性主義窺見美國精神分析，然後回到坐在治療室裡的自己。